Under UK law, directors carry a clear obligation to ensure the financial statements of their companies are accurate. Section 393(1) of the Companies Act 2006 requires that no director should approve accounts unless they are satisfied that those accounts provide a true and fair representation of the firm’s financial position. This is not a mere formality: the legislation explicitly warns against signing off on inaccurate or misleading statements concerning assets, liabilities, and overall financial health.

Why ‘Hiring an Accountant’ Is Not Enough

It might be tempting for directors to argue that the day-to-day accounting work rests in an external advisor’s hands. However, courts and regulators have repeatedly emphasised that while hiring a professional accountant is prudent, responsibility for the integrity of the accounts ultimately remains with the directors. Even the most skilled accountant can only work with the information and instructions received; if the data is flawed, the resulting accounts will inevitably be compromised. The old adage “garbage in, garbage out” resonates strongly in this context.

Distinguishing Assembly from Comprehension

Understanding the numbers is different from compiling them. Corporate accounts are prepared through established processes such as double-entry bookkeeping, along with the application of recognised accounting standards. Directors do not need to master the technicalities of these processes in order to take responsibility. Instead, they must possess sufficient financial literacy to read and interpret the final statements—balance sheets, profit and loss accounts, and explanatory notes—so that they can vouch for their accuracy.

What Constitutes a ‘True and Fair View’?

Accounts deemed ‘true and fair’ are those that adhere to accepted accounting policies, applied consistently and disclosed properly. Directors are obliged to sign a statement declaring that the financial statements meet this standard, but the statutory language does not specifically define what ‘true and fair’ means. In practical terms, it means the accounts should be reasonably accurate and not misleading. This standard aims to protect shareholders, creditors, and other stakeholders, all of whom rely on an honest snapshot of the company’s finances.

Unlawful Dividends and the Risk to Creditors

Another practical reason for a director’s solid grasp of corporate accounts arises when distributing profits to shareholders. Paying dividends out of capital rather than genuine distributable reserves is unlawful. The central rationale behind this rule is that creditors should not be placed at risk by the distribution of funds to shareholders if the company lacks sufficient profits. Directors, therefore, must be certain that real reserves exist before authorising any dividend payment, or they could face liability for acting to the detriment of creditors.

Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd v Fielding & Anor: A Fault-Based Standard

A key insight into directors’ liability emerged from Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd v Fielding & Anor [2019]. The court there held that directors might rely on accountants or other professionals to determine whether dividends can lawfully be paid. However, this reliance is not absolute immunity from blame. The judgment clarified that liability rests upon fault rather than strict liability, meaning a director who can show reasonable reliance on expert judgment may escape automatic sanction. Still, the court also emphasised that the line between permissible delegation and outright abdication of responsibility is a fine one, especially if the director personally benefits from unlawfully distributed funds.

Who Is Ultimately Responsible?

There remains a tension between an accountant’s limited engagement—which often stipulates that ultimate responsibility lies with the board—and the director’s instinct to say “I hired a specialist to do this.” If the director signs off on a balance sheet without independently verifying that it genuinely reflects the company’s financial position, the question arises: does this discharge their obligations or merely pass the buck? Legislation and case law make clear that the final onus still rests with directors. They must be confident, through their own understanding, that the accounts are a fair depiction of the business’s assets and liabilities.

Navigating the Director’s Balance Sheet Declaration

When a director puts their signature on the balance sheet, they are effectively endorsing an assurance that the document is both accurate and not misleading. If directors claim they lack the expertise to make this determination, that in itself poses a problem: the law does not excuse them from this obligation. While skilled accountants are indispensable for preparing financial statements and offering technical guidance, directors cannot simply disclaim knowledge. After all, if the accountant and the director each disclaim responsibility, then nobody truly stands behind the integrity of the accounts.

A Call for Practical Oversight

For directors who do not come from a financial background, it is crucial to establish effective systems of internal control and oversight. Regular board meetings, timely management accounts, and accessible explanations of key figures can all help directors understand where the company stands. Above all, directors should never sign anything they do not comprehend, especially in relation to reported profits and balance sheet reserves that influence decisions such as paying dividends.

Conclusion

Ultimately, a director’s duty to understand the company’s accounts goes beyond a box-ticking exercise. By law, directors must ensure their companies’ accounts present an honest record of the financial realities. Engaging accountants can be wise and even necessary, but it does not absolve directors from their final obligation. The responsibilities of stewardship demand that directors equip themselves with enough financial awareness to safeguard the interests of shareholders, creditors, and the company itself.

If you need any advice on this matter, please contact us at help@cootsandboots.com.